Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Semler v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv04663
Petitioner:
Raymond L. Semler
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hausfeld v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Brian Hausfeld
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Emily Johnson Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Johnson Piper
as 0:2017cv04356
Petitioner:
Terrance J. Friend
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linehan v. Piper
as 0:2017cv04355
Petitioner:
Dennis D. Linehan
Respondent:
Emily Johnson Piper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wong v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00704
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wong
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Robert Rose, Brian Ninneman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desjarlais v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00675
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Desjarlais
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Robert Rose, Brian Ninneman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Johnson Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Benson
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Shelby Richardson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, David Herman, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Services et al
as 0:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
David Le Roy Gamble, Jr., Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, David James Jannetta and others
Defendant:
Minnesota State-Operated Services , Minnesota State Industries , Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stabnow v. Johnson-Piper et al
as 0:2016cv02648
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stabnow
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper , Shelby Richardson , Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
