Cases 61 - 70 of 83
William Stevens v. Department of Human Services,, et al
as 15-2004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, RUSHVILLE TREATMENT AND DETENTION FACILITY, SEAN JUMPER, Doctor and LIBERTY HEALTH CARE, INCORPORATED
Banks v. Pam Ahlin
as 1:2015cv00605
Plaintiff:
Steven Banks
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Bednarz et al
as 3:2014cv03385
Plaintiff:
William J Stevens
Defendant:
Bednarz, Wensing and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Allenby et al
as 1:2014cv01973
Plaintiff:
Steven Banks
Defendant:
Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Allenby et al
as 5:2014cv05211
Plaintiff:
Steven Banks
Defendant:
Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens et al v. Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility et al
as 3:2014cv03328
Plaintiff:
William J Stevens and George K Martin
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, Sean Jumper and Liberty Health Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philpott v. King et al
as 1:2014cv01766
Plaintiff:
Steven Philpott
Defendant:
Audrey King, Cliff Allenby, Tom Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Guy Groot, et al
as 14-2478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY GROOT, Team Leader and STEVEN SCHOSTAK, Clinical Therapist
Alfonso Mouzon v. Pam Ahlin, et al
as 14-16261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO MOUZON
Defendant - Appellee:
PAM AHLIN, Ex-Executive Director of Coalinga State Hospital, STEVEN MAYBERG, Ex-Director of Deparment of Mental Health, CLIFF ALLENBY, Director of the Department of Mental Health and others
Steven Evink v. USA
as 14-1788
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN EVINK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
