Cases 1 - 10 of 14
al-Haju v. Religious Accomodations Committee et al
as 4:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Silm al-Haju and Norman Toler
Defendant:
Religious Accomodations Committee, Southeast Missouri Mental Health Center, Sexual Offender Rehabilitation & Treatment Services and Chuck Lotz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. Sutphin et al
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Pratt
Defendant:
Glenn Sutphin and Larry W. Shellito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toler v. Semar et al
as 4:2021cv01219
Plaintiff:
Norman Toler
Defendant:
Janine Semar, Chuck Lotz, Dr. Bill Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toler v. Messersmith et al
as 4:2021cv00290
Defendant:
Southest Missouri Mental Health Center-Sex Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment Services and Jennifer Messersmith
Plaintiff:
Norman Toler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Geo Care Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Randolph Campbell, III
Defendant:
Geo Care Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Donald A. Sawyer, Rebecca Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Pennock et al
as 4:2016cv04123
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brown
Defendant:
Wanda Pennock, Greg Scott, Joesph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Norman
as 4:2015cv04214
Plaintiff:
Willie Henderson
Defendant:
Steve Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toler v. Lotz et al
as 4:2015cv01455
Plaintiff:
Norman Noah Toler
Defendant:
Chuck Lotz, Janine Semar, Jay Engelhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Henderson v. Krista Wilcoxen, et al
as 15-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTA WILCOXEN, GREGG SCOTT, STEVE NORMAN, STA and others
Nash v. Norman et al
as 3:2015cv03010
Plaintiff:
Dennis Nash, Jr.
Defendant:
. Norman, Wanda Pennock, Brian Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
