Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Senty-Haugen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Jesson et al
as 0:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey v. Kneisel et al
as 0:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Terry Kneisel, Scott Benoit, Thane Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2018cv02959
Respondent:
Mark Dayton, Emily Piper Johnson, Lori Swanson and others
Petitioner:
Byron Kenneth Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hausfeld v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Brian Hausfeld
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Emily Johnson Piper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allan v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, David Herman, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senty-Haugen et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2014cv03405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Russell John Hatton and Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggert v. Ovsak et al
as 0:2014cv01677
Plaintiff:
William Eggert
Defendant:
Keri A. Ovsak, Andy Kvien, Lisa Nygren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
