Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 22-1057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Kevin D. Moser and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
