Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff: Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant: State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff: Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff: Hollis J. Larson
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff: Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv02166
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv01798
Plaintiff: Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meranelli v. State of Minnesota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00946
Plaintiff: Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric Sorenson
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyrone Ward v. Minnesota Dept. of Human Svcs., et al
as 22-1398
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tyrone Franklin Ward
Defendant / Appellee: Minnesota Department of Human Services and Minnesota Security Hospital
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 22-1057
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant / Appellee: State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Daywitt et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00007
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daywitt, Justin Newman, Andrew Day and others
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services and Richard McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?