Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schmidt, . Jumper, . Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities, Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities., Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities. and others
Stabnow v. Johnson-Piper et al
as 0:2016cv02648
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stabnow
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper , Shelby Richardson , Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. DesLauriers et al
as 6:2014cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Baker, David E. Benton, Sr., Richard L. Cochran and others
Defendant:
Austin DesLauriers, Sean Wagner, Tom Kinlen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
