Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jeffrey Payne v. Department of Social and Health Services, et al
as 22-35506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PAYNE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, a subdivision of the State of Washington, SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER, an agency of DSHS, HENRY RICHARDS and others
Payne v. Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2020cv05950
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services, Special Commitment Center, Sjan Talbot and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bettys v. Hamil et al
as 3:2020cv05078
Defendant:
Mark McFarland, Elana Lopez, John/Jane Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Bettys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Talbot et al
as 3:2019cv05141
Defendant:
Byron Eagle, Krystal Dykstra, Sjan Talbot and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Belcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Bettys v. Kevin Quigley, et al
as 18-35285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E BETTYS
Defendant:
KEVIN QUIGLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLI CORYELL, ELENA LOPEZ, JUSTIN GRIMM and others
Samuel Donaghe v. Patrisha Lashway, et al
as 17-35919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRISHA LASHWAY, JOHN CLAYTON, WILLIAM VAN HOOK and others
Donaghe v. Lashway et al
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Lashaway et al
as 3:2016cv05626
Plaintiff:
John E Bettys
Defendant:
Patricia Lashaway , John Clayton , William VanHook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Powers v. Wexford Health Services, et al
as 15-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES and PAUL TALBOT, Doctor
Gray v. Martin et al
as 3:2014cv01418
Plaintiff:
Darren Gray
Defendant:
Phil Martin, Elaine Hardy, John Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
