Cases 81 - 90 of 200
Graham v. HRchitect, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02213
Plaintiff:
Jana Graham
Defendant:
HRchitect, Inc. and Matt Lafata
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Graham v. Interworld Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02179
Plaintiff:
Lance Graham
Defendant:
Interworld Cleaning, Inc. and Asrorjon Shukurov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez v. Grundy Pizza, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
Shelby Sanchez
Defendant:
Grundy Pizza, Inc. and William Graham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GRAHAM v. THE WATERSHED TREATMENT PROGRAMS INC
as 9:2016cv80521
Plaintiff:
CALVIN GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE WATERSHED TREATMENT PROGRAMS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Welch v. Joe Cool Air Conditioning & Heating of the Suncoast, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
John E. Welch, Jr.
Defendant:
Joe Cool Air Conditioning & Heating of the Suncoast, Inc. and Thomas M. Graham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ekryss et al v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv06742
Plaintiff:
Jhared Ekryss, Connie Jean Juergens, Stephen Seigal and others
Defendant:
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., Raymond A. Blanchette, III, Kevin Cottingim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Niren v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. et al.
as 1:2015cv09517
Defendant:
Peloton Interactive, Inc. , John Foley , Yony Feng and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Niren
Hames v. Palo Chop Development LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03825
Defendant:
Palo Chop Development LLC, Palo Petroleum Inc, Jace Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Hames, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Graham v. Youth Villages, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03463
Defendant:
Youth Villages, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Byron Graham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Greer v. Ardoin, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00415
Plaintiff:
Shane Greer , Dudley Murle Graham , Joshua Brown and others
Defendant:
Ardoin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
