Cases 1 - 10 of 58
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant:
WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
TANIESHA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Management & Employee Relations
WILLIAMS v. KOURY CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. TWOROG HOLDING, LLC
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TWOROG HOLDING, LLC doing business as AARONS
Russell v. Nivo Corporation
as 5:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William R. Russell
Defendant:
Nivo Corporation doing business as Mekkelek Custom Woodwork & Cabinetry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Akers et al v. County of Sampson
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Akers, Jessica Byrd, Joseph Byrd and others
Defendant:
County of Sampson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. GBR PIZZA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Carvis Williams
Defendant:
GBR Pizza, Inc., Gerald B. Rhodes, John Doe, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Speight v. Labor Source, LLC
as 4:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
William Speight
Defendant:
Labor Source, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ruppe et al v. Carpenter Design, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ruppe and William Toney
Defendant:
Carpenter Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pitts et al v. LStar Development Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Rachel E. Vradenburgh, Patrick "Pete" Sullivan, William Hampton Pitts and others
Defendant:
LStar Development Group, Inc. and Kyle V. Corkum
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
