Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Taylor v. LL Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Defendant:
LL Flooring, Inc., Lumber Liquidator Inc. and Michael Klinga
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Taylor, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC.
as 2:2022cv04506
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC and LL FLOORING DESIGNS
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mason et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04780
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Becerra, Ryan Carroll, Osagie Ehigie and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Shabazz et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03889
Plaintiff:
Courtney Shabazz and Eliezar Suarez
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Su v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv22158
Plaintiff:
Roberto Su
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc and Oneida Arrieta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Monroy v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 8:2010cv01969
Plaintiff:
Fabio Monroy
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chavez et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2009cv04812
Plaintiff:
Crelencio Chavez, Crelencio Chavez, Crelencio Chavez and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
