Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Nguyen v. Nguyen
as 3:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
huynh xuan nguyen
Defendant:
Nguyen thanh tam thi and Tam Thi Thanh Nguyen doing business as Home Furniture Design Mfg.
Briseno v. Thithi Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04186
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Briseno
Defendant:
Thithi Restaurant Inc., Thi Thi Pham and Tam Nguyen
Ramirez Pinto v. Popular Nails II, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00951
Defendant:
Tam Hung Nguyen, Popular Nails II, Inc., Mojito Nail Bar Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Delmy A. Ramirez Pinto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Keller v. Kodiak Concepts LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01120
Plaintiff:
Aarin Keller
Defendant:
Anthony Tam, Unknown Parties, Kodiak Concepts LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Niamkey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03279
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Augustin Tam Niamkey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Le v. Triza Electrical Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05134
Plaintiff:
Tam Le
Defendant:
Triza Electrical Corp., Abdessamad Elhaddad and Chris Triantafillou
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luk et al v. ABNS NY INC. et al
as 1:2018cv05170
Plaintiff:
Carole W K Luk, Ying Ying Dai and Carole Luk
Defendant:
ABNS NY INC., SHK LI INC. and Ka Shek Tam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
UcPech v. China Panda Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02304
Defendant:
China Panda Restaurant, Inc., Cui Huang-Tam and China Panda Restaurant, Inc. doing business as China Panda
Plaintiff:
Pedro UcPech
Chen v. Edo Sushi & Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06081
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Edo Sushi&Grill, INC, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Fensong Chen and Fen Song Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jason N. Nguyen v. Impac Mortgage
as 8:2017cv00723
Defendant:
CashCall, Inc., Impac Mortgage and Impac Mortgage doing business as CashCall Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Tam Nguyen and Jason N. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
