Cases 11 - 20 of 22
PRIDDY v. MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
TONDRA PRIDDY
Defendant:
MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES , THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , CONE HEALTH CONNECTED CARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WHERRY V. FORSTYH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
KATHERN WHERRY
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thompson v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Tammy B. Thompson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC and Christopher Gough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DENTON v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU SUPPORT SERVICES CORP.
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
ALANA TOMLIN DENTON
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU SUPPORT SERVICES CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pyatt v. Macon County et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Marialena Pyatt
Defendant:
Macon County , Macon County Department of Social Services , Jane Kimsey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Todd, et al v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 5:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Citronella Todd and Dawn Cause
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Foster v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC -
as 4:2015cv00101
Defendant:
Latasha Nicole Foster and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Foster v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 5:2015cv00256
Defendant:
Latasha Nicole Foster and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cruthirds v. Lacey et al
as 5:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Cruthirds
Defendant:
Raymond P. Lacey, Brandi Swart, Kathy J. Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MILES v. LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2013cv01077
Defendant:
LANKFORD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MILES
Mediator:
KENNETH P. CARLSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
