Cases 91 - 100 of 146
Terrance Clayborn v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 5:2020cv02368
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Services Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Terrance Clayborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv07792
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ricky Diaz, Emanuel Adamson and Juan Manuel Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alvarado et al v. Amazon.com, Services LLC
as 5:2020cv07292
Plaintiff:
Steven Alvarado
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Christian Porter v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2020cv09496
Plaintiff:
Christian Porter
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Schumann v. Amazon.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01751
Plaintiff:
Canan Schumann
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Sanchez v. Green Messengers, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06538
Defendant:
Green Messengers, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hans Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARPER v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09771
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. and AMAZON FLEX
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JEMERSON v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2020cv08502
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE JEMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JEMERSON v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2020cv08502
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE JEMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mabanta v. Prime Now LLC et al
as 4:2020cv02813
Plaintiff:
Mario Mabanta
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and PRIME NOW LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.