Cases 91 - 100 of 28,941
Shugars et al v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv02765
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. doing business as Spark Driver formerly known as Delivery Drivers, Inc., and Delivery Drivers, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Crystal Shugars and Niccole Le'Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ANDUJAR et al v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDUJAR and FRANKLIN PENA BATISTA
Defendant:
Hub Group Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Andrews v. Cubesmart LP
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Erin Andrews
Defendant:
Cubesmart LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Hartzell v. Insight Global LLC
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
John Hartzell
Defendant:
Insight Global, LLC
Gary Yudin v. Norkol, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Gary Yudin
Defendant:
D Norkol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Schnell v. Interstate Assembly Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024at00568
Plaintiff:
Kurt Schnell
Defendant:
Interstate Assembly Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Geist v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Tamara Geist
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Schnell v. Interstate Assembly Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01314
Plaintiff:
Kurt Schnell
Defendant:
Interstate Assembly Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Derek Moss et al v. HPC Industrial Services, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03760
Plaintiff:
Derek Moss and Clean Harbors, Inc.
Defendant:
HPC Industrial Services, LLC and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Floyd v. Highgate Hotels L.P.
as 1:2024cv21770
Plaintiff:
Contrell Leo Floyd
Defendant:
Highgate Hotels L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
