Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Chulindra Cooks v. Uaw Local 699 et al
as 2:2021cv12640
Plaintiff:
Chulindra Cooks
Defendant:
Uaw Local 699, Tom Hurst, Rhonda Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Hatch v. Preckwinkle et al
as 1:2020cv04341
Defendant:
Illinois Secretary of State Department of Administrative Hearings, Cook County, Illinois Secretary of State, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Hatch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Landgren v. Cook County
as 1:2021cv03899
Plaintiff:
David Landgren
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation, and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Teddy Bear Andrews et al v. Michaels Store, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02294
Defendant:
Michaels Store, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Teddy Bear Andrews and Joleen Cook
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Cook v. Citigroup, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05458
Plaintiff:
Jerome Cook
Defendant:
Citigroup, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Tooley et al v. Quickway Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brandy Cook and Warren Tooley
Defendant:
Quickway Logistics, Inc., Quickway Transportation, Inc. and Paladin Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Miller v. Elk Grove Township of Cook County, Illinois
as 1:2020cv03305
Defendant:
Elk Grove Township of Cook County, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bode et al v. C.R. England, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01620
Plaintiff:
Jason Asher, Marty Cook and Mark Bode
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Cook v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01591
Defendant:
LV Shaw, TF Bartley and Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inc
Plaintiff:
Danny M Cook
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Dixon v. Cook County
as 1:2019cv05854
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation, and Cook County
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
