Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Luz Iraheta v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv03947
Plaintiff:
Luz Iraheta
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation and DOES 1-100,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Campuzano et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv02152
Plaintiff:
Ariana Beltran Campuzano and Zoe Lima
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Does 1 through 50 inclusive and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Cowan Hamada
as 1:2023cv15404
Plaintiff:
Regional Director Angie Cowan Hamada
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Hooks v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv01000
Petitioner:
Ronald K Hooks
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Intervenor:
Workers United
Lomax v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2023cv01426
Petitioner:
Matthew S. Lomax
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Anderson et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2020cv01178
Plaintiff:
Christina Denton, Katherine Butler, James Hancock and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brekke et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Omar Galrland, Casey McKay and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kerry Connelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2021at00525
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and DOES 1 - 50, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Kerry Connelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOUIS v. HMSHost Corporation
as 0:2020cv61727
Plaintiff:
CINCIA LOUIS
Defendant:
HMSHost Corporation doing business as Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.