Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shull v. Community Bank of Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Krystal Shull
Defendant:
Community Bank of Mississippi and Kristi Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Twinkle Tuttle v. DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07154
Plaintiff:
Twinkle Tuttle
Defendant:
DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc., Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Twinkle Tuttle v. DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Twinkle Tuttle
Defendant:
DVA Renal Healthcare, Inc., Davita Healthcare Partners, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Padovano et al v. FEDEX Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Padovano , Thomas Werndle , Chris Arber and others
Defendant:
FEDEX Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Welch et al v. Golden Gate Casino, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01089
Defendant:
Desert Rock Enterprises, LLC, Golden Gate Casino, LLC and Dave Tuttle
Plaintiff:
Michelle Garcia and Brandy Welch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
James Knopf v. Chicago Bridge and Iron Company et al
as 2:2012cv04744
Defendant:
CB and I Inc., Chicago Bridge and Iron Company, Chicago Bridge and Iron Company Delaware and others
Plaintiff:
James Knopf
Craig v. Siemens Energy Inc
as 4:2011cv02857
Defendant:
Siemens Energy Inc
Plaintiff:
Tuttle Craig
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sue Ann Tuttle a/k/a Sue Ann Waterman v. Macy's Florida Stores, LLC et al
as 9:2011cv80226
Defendant:
Macy's Florida Stores, LLC , Macy's Inc and Corporate Services, RA
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Tuttle
Mediator:
Malcolm H. Fromberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Craig v. Siemens Energy, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01532
Defendant:
Siemens Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tuttle Craig
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
