Cases 51 - 60 of 101
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ACADEMY CONCRETE & MASONRY, INC.
as 2:2012cv05348
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORER'S DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
ACADEMY CONCRETE & MASONRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. CROWN PERFORMANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv04795
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
CROWN PERFORMANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. NESHAMINY BRICK & BLOCK, INC.
as 2:2012cv03613
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
NESHAMINY BRICK & BLOCK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BOYER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
ROSA STEPHENS BOYER
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. LEWANDOWSKI COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2012cv02637
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
LEWANDOWSKI COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MOLLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2012cv02254
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
MOLLY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ROBERT MICHAELS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 2:2012cv01200
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
ROBERT MICHAELS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SECKINGER et al
as 2:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
STEVE SECKINGER and CRI RESTORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ATLANTIC 3 CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv00416
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC 3 CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Boyer v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
Doug Boyer
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
