Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams et al v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Debra M Adams, Danillie L Mars, Michelle L Miller and others
Defendant:
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic, Board of Trustees of Dartmouth Hitchcock Clinic, Administrative Investment Oversight Committee of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
IBEW Local 490 Pension Plan, Trustees v. Doe
as 1:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the IBEW Local 490 Pension Plan and IBEW Local 490 Pension Plan, Trustees
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Life Insurance Company of North America v. Estate of Desma Oakes et al
as 1:2019cv01191
Defendant:
Colby Oickle, Donald Oakes, Estate of Desma Oakes and others
Plaintiff:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Faiella v. The Standard
as 1:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
John Faiella
Defendant:
The Standard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Puglisi et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Frances M. Puglisi and John Snapausky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Duda et al v. Standard Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv00479
Plaintiff:
John Duda, Donald Leatherwood and Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, LLC
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Standard Insurance Company
Respondent:
Norman Selander-Carrier
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Meehan et al v. Magdalen College
as 1:2011cv00174
Defendant:
Magdalen College
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Meehan and John D. Meehan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al v. Martineau
as 1:2010cv00569
Defendant:
John J. Kelley, Jr. and Maribeth Kelley Martineau
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
