Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alston et al v. 3111 Ocean Parkway Associates et al
as 1:2024cv04153
Plaintiff:
Trustee Fred Alston, as a Trustee of the Local 272 Labor-Management Pension Fund and Trustee Fred Alston as a Trustee of the Local 272 Welfare Fund
Defendant:
3111 Ocean Parkway Associates, Somerset MGMT LTD and EL E & D Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
D. et al v. United Medical Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
J. D. and E. D.
Defendant:
United Medical Resources d/b/a UMR, Nouryon Chemicals LLC, Nouryon Chemicals LLC Group Health Benefit Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D. et al v. Sanofi Aventis US et al
as 2:2021cv00303
Defendant:
Sanofi Aventis US and Sanofi Aventis US LLC Group Health & Welfare Plan
Plaintiff:
Keith D., Owen E. and J. E. D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
E. D. et al v. Nippon Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2020cv02189
Defendant:
Nippon Life Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
John D. and E. D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
J.E.D. et al v. Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01162
Plaintiff:
J. E. D., J. D. and S. D.
Defendant:
Anthem Health Plans of Virginia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 58 Retirement Fund et al v. S & D Enterprises et al
as 5:2007cv01334
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 58 Retirement Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 58 Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 58 Education Fund and others
Defendant:
S & D Enterprises, E. D. Industries, Inc. and Elliot DeFalco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
