Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In Re: Cigna Corp. Erisa Litig
as 12-4150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM NOLTE, SHERRY LEWIS, THERESA MITCHELL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIGNA CORP and CIGNA INVESTMENT REVIEW GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
H. EDWARD HANWAY and STEWART M. BELTZ
Roofers Local No. 30 Combined, et al v. D.A. Nolt Inc
as 10-3854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BD TRUSTEES ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY, In His Fiduciary Capacity
Defendant - Appellant:
D.A. NOLT INC
Roofers Local No. 30 Combined, et al v. D.A. Nolt Inc
as 10-3753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BD TRUSTEES ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY, In His Fiduciary Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
D.A. NOLT INC
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND et al v. D.A. NOLT, INC.
as 2:2009cv01445
Plaintiff:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY
Defendant:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nolte v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01699
Plaintiff:
Diane Nolte
Defendant:
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Nolte v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc et al
as 3:2007cv00782
Plaintiff:
Diane Nolte
Defendant:
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc and BellSouth Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Nolte et al v. CIGNA Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02046
Plaintiff:
Kim Nolte, Kim Nolte, Kim Nolte and others
Defendant:
CIGNA Corporation, CIGNA Corporation, CIGNA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
