Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ivanova et al
as 3:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Astrik Ivanova and Deluxe Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PICKENS, et al
as 1:2019cv00784
Defendant:
Rosemary's Babe, LLC, Stanton Mercer Pickens and THE NORTHSIDE DISTRICT
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. B & D Adventure, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp. and others
Defendant:
B & D Adventure, LLC and Jeffrey S. Boles
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. ERIC TODD LITTLETON
as 1:2012cv01105
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , UNIVERSAL-SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. , MIC SHAU MUSIC COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ERIC TODD LITTLETON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CURINGTON v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
ROBERT B. CURINGTON
Defendant:
UMG RECORDINGS, INC., JOE WHEELER, TEMPORAL SONGS, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KURTZ AND BLUM, PLLC v. THE WRIGHT LAW FIRM OF CHARLOTTE, PLLC et al
as 5:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
KURTZ AND BLUM, PLLC
Defendant:
THE WRIGHT LAW FIRM OF CHARLOTTE, PLLC, JOE ALFORD, JR. and RODERICK M WRIGHT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WB Music Corp. et al v. E.F.S. Enterprises inc.
as 4:2008cv00163
Plaintiff:
WB Music Corp., Beef Puppet Music, Steven Tallarico and others
Defendant:
E. F. S. Enterprises Inc. and Edward F. Sinram
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WB Music Corp. et al v. E.F.S. Enterprises inc.
as 7:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
WB Music Corp., Beef Puppet Music, Steven Tallarico and others
Defendant:
E. F. S. Enterprises Inc. and Edward F. Sinram
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
