Patent Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00111
Defendant: Kayak Software Corporation, Orbitz Worldwide Inc, Yahoo! Inc and others
Consolidated Defendant: JAG Footwear, Accessories and Retail Corporation, Onestop Internet, Inc., HSN LP and others
Plaintiff: Parallel Networks, LLC
Not Yet Classified: Richard Grainger, Michael McLemore and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TMI Solutions LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff: TMI Solutions LLC
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
uLogin LLC v. The Gap Inc
as 2:2015cv01418
Plaintiff: uLogin LLC
Defendant: The Gap Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. The Gap Inc.
as 6:2015cv00181
Plaintiff: Qommerce Systems, LLC
Defendant: The Gap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JPT Group, LLC v. Old Navy, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv02605
Defendant: Old Navy, LLC, Old Navy Inc., Old Navy (California) LLC and others
Plaintiff: JPT Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
RevoLaze LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01821
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Plaintiff: RevoLaze LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Icon Laser Solutions LLC v. The Gap Inc
as 3:2014cv02622
Plaintiff: Icon Laser Solutions LLC
Defendant: The Gap Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00986
Plaintiff: eDekka LLC
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ingeniador, LLC v. The Gap, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01487
Plaintiff: Ingeniador, LLC
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Smart Search Concepts LLC v. Gap Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01035
Plaintiff: Smart Search Concepts LLC
Defendant: Gap Inc. , Athleta Inc. , Banana Republic LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?