Cases 41 - 50 of 448
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
JINJIANGSHISILULIANGPINJINCHUKOUMAOYI CO., LTD. v. The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A
as 1:2023cv04687
Plaintiff:
JINJIANGSHISILULIANGPINJINCHUKOUMAOYI CO., LTD. and Changsa Mylongingcharm Accessories Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A, YUEARN, CECEFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00904
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
P & F Brother Industrial Corporation v. Lowes Companies, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
P & F Brother Industrial Corporation
Defendant:
Lowes Companies, Inc., and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
P & F Brother Industrial Corporation v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
P & F Brother Industrial Corporation
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
