Cases 71 - 80 of 2,893
BALOGH et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BALOGH, GEORGE BAUMAN, BRIDGET COLLINS and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Not Yet Classified:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
MUKHERJEE v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06131
Plaintiff:
AYAN MUKHERJEE
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
618Media Dijital Hizmetler Limited Sirketi v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02952
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
618Media Dijital Hizmetler Limited Sirketi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
DELUCA v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06381
Plaintiff:
ANA DELUCA
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
HERNANDEZ v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06380
Plaintiff:
MAURICIO HERNANDEZ
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
AGUIAR v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06341
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Plaintiff:
ERALDO AGUIAR
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
FILTER v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06342
Plaintiff:
MARISA FILTER
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
RODGERS v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06343
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Unknown:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Whiteside v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02699
Plaintiff:
Kyle T. Whiteside
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Shekhovtsov
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
