Cases 81 - 87 of 87
BSH Home Appliances Corporation v. Earl
as 4:2008cv02964
Plaintiff:
BSH Home Appliances Corporation and BSH Home Appliances Corporation
Defendant:
James Earl, Lavester Valdez Stewart and Windsor Case, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Hot Stitch, LLC v. Ashley Stewart, Ltd. et al
as 1:2008cv06296
Plaintiff:
Hot Stitch, LLC
Defendant:
Ashley Stewart, Ltd., Urban Brands, Inc. and Ethan Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
International Technologies Consultants, Incorporated v. Stewart et al
as 2:2007cv13391
Plaintiff:
International Technologies Consultants, Incorporated and International Technologies Consultants, Incorporated
Defendant:
Leslie T. Stewart and Stewart Engineers and Associates, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
New York State Department of Economic Development v. Stewart et al
as 1:2007cv03786
Plaintiff:
New York State Department of Economic Development and New York State Department of Economic Development
Defendant:
Michael Nnamdi Stewart and Mosayk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE, LLC v. STEWART
as 1:2007cv01970
Plaintiff:
CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE, LLC
Defendant:
H. DONALD STEWART
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. v. Stewart
as 3:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Advanced Disposal Services, Inc., Advanced Disposal Services, Inc. and Advanced Disposal Services Jacksonville, LLC
Defendant:
Reese Stewart, Kinkoff, Richard, Grey, Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sonja G Keith et al v. Joe Blow T's Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00291
Plaintiff:
Sonja G Keith and The Corvette Lady
Defendant:
Joe Blow T's Inc, Stewart Cohen, Eckler Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
