Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Snyder v. Neogen Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02440
Plaintiff: Tiffany Snyder
Defendant: Neogen Corporation, John E. Ardent, James C. Borel and others
Aramic LLC v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv09585
Plaintiff: Aramic LLC
Defendant: Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Mark J. Foley and Tobin C. Schilke
LaChance v. Bridge Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08719
Defendant: Marcia Z. Hefter, Daniel Rubin, Bridge Bancorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Don LaChance
Rotondo v. Bridge Bancorp, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv07841
Defendant: Marcia Z. Hefter, Daniel Rubin, Bridge Bancorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Rotondo
Lamb-Fort v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05779
Plaintiff: Ryan Lamb-Fort
Defendant: Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, Mark J. Toland and others
Rauner v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09056
Defendant: David W. Long, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff: Michael Rauner
Summers v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12024
Defendant: Nathan R. Harrington, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Mark J. Toland and others
Plaintiff: Douglas Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Shea v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08918
Defendant: Campbell D. Rogers, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington and others
Plaintiff: Alec Shea
Sabatini v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01752
Plaintiff: Eric Sabatini
Defendant: Nathan R. Harrington, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Mark J. Toland and others
Bruso v. Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08536
Plaintiff: John Bruso
Defendant: Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc., Nathan R. Harrington, David W. Long and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?