Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Kent v. Anixter International INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02239
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Lord James Blyth, Melvyn N. Klein, Charles M. Swoboda and others
Stein v. Anixter International INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02242
Defendant:
Lord James Blyth, Melvyn N. Klein, Charles M. Swoboda and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Pill v. Anixter International Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02301
Defendant:
Lord James Blyth, Melvyn N. Klein, Charles M. Swoboda and others
Plaintiff:
David Pill
In re Everyware Global Inc. Securities Litigation
as 2:2014cv01838
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local No. 58 Annuity Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund of IBEW Local No. 58, Detroit, Michigan and IBEW Local No. 58
Defendant:
Everyware Global, Inc., John K Sheppard, Bernard F Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
IBEW Local No. 58 Annuity Fun, et al v. Everyware Global, Inc., et al
as 16-3445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IBEW LOCAL NO. 58 ANNUITY FUND, ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF IBEW LOCAL NO. 58, DETROIT, MICHIGAN and IBEW LOCAL NO. 58
Defendant - Appellee:
EVERYWARE GLOBAL, INC., JOHN K SHEPPARD, BERNARD F PETERS and others
Grant v. Dynegy, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Grant
Defendant:
Dynegy, Inc., Bruce A. Williamson, David W. Biegler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huddleston v. Blakely et al
as 1:2010cv04125
Plaintiff:
Pat Huddleston II
Defendant:
Kandice Blakely, Peter Breese, David Paul Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Springer et al v. Williamson et al
as 4:2010cv03710
Plaintiff:
William Springer and Rita Springer
Defendant:
Bruce A Williamson , Patricia A Hammick , David W Biegler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tansey v. Dynegy, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv03320
Plaintiff:
Edward Tansey
Defendant:
Dynegy, Inc. , Bruce A Williamson , Holli C Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
