Cases 21 - 30 of 195
Smith v. Magenta Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Magenta Therapeutics, Inc., Alison Lawton, Jeffrey Albers and others
Collins v. NexTier Oilfield Soultions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Keith Collins
Defendant:
NexTier Oilfield Soultions Inc., Robert Drummond, Leslie Beyer and others
Feldman v. NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
John Feldman
Defendant:
NexTier Oilfield Solutions Inc., Robert Drummond, Leslie Beyer and others
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Martin v. Bradway et al
as 1:2023cv06754
Plaintiff:
Leon Martin
Defendant:
Robert A. Bradway, Wanda Austin, Michael Drake and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amgen, Inc.
In Re Norfolk Southern Corporation Bond/Note Securities Litigation
as 1:2023cv04068
Plaintiff:
Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund and City of Pontiac Reestablished General Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Alan H. Shaw, James A. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Eun Kim v. Parcel K- Tudor Hall Farm LLC
as 23-1482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN O. KIM, CHIN KIM, DANIEL I. KIM and others
Plaintiff:
AMY HSIANG-CHI TONG and HONG S. CHUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
PARCEL K- TUDOR HALL FARM LLC
Thompson v. INDUS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03518
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
INDUS Realty Trust, Inc., David R. Bechtel, Frederick M Danziger and others
Smith v. INDUS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
INDUS Realty Trust, Inc., David R. Bechtel, Frederick M. Danziger and others
O'Dell v. INDUS Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
INDUS Realty Trust, Inc., David R. Bechtel, Frederick M. Danziger and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
