Cases 61 - 70 of 117
Calle Gracey v. Bank of America Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv05931
Plaintiff:
Roberto E Calle Gracey and Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp, Bank of America LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re IndyMac Mortgage-Backed
as 11-3036
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, individually, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Wyoming State Treasurer and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Appellant:
City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, AKA "Philadelphia"
Defendant:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, The McGraw-Hill Companies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Olinski and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement System, AKA "LACERA" and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, AKA "PERS"
Intervenor:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
In Re IndyMac Mortgage Backed
as 11-2998
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement of System of the City of Detroit, individually, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Wyoming State Treasurer and others
Consolidated-Defendant:
Lynette Antosh, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR14, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2006-AR2 and others
Defendant:
Moody's Investor Services, Incorporation, Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, The McGraw-Hill Companies and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Indymac MBS, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Olinski and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv10992
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc.
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., , Citigroup Global Markets Inc , Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Calle Gracey v. BANK OF AMERICA CORP. et al
as 1:2011cv03739
Plaintiff:
Roberto E Calle Gracey
Defendant:
Bank of America Corp, Bank of America LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The Union Central Life Insurance Company et al v. Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv02890
Plaintiff:
The Union Central Life Insurance Company , Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. and Acacia Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CITIGROUP INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02583
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
CITIGROUP INC. , CITIGROUP CAPITAL XXI , GARY CRITTENDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Fuld et al
as 1:2011cv01281
Plaintiff:
The California Public Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Richard S. Fuld, Jr., Christopher M. O'Meara, Erin M. Callan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nicholis Repke v. JP Morgan Chase and Co. et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Nicholis Repke
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Co. , J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp. , J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Kensik et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
James D Kensik and Arthur Tonelli
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. , J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
