Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hurst v. Avils et al
as 2:2024cv04190
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hurst
Defendant:
Brian Sandoval, Cory Miller, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Carone v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al
as 2:2024cv04180
Plaintiff:
Gary Thomas Carone
Defendant:
Nancy G Mistretta, Gerald Volas, David C Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Padilla et al
as 1:2023cv11331
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Joseph A. Padilla, Kevin C. Dills, Bright Star International, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Ballard v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Sandoval v. Intricon Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sandoval
Defendant:
Intricon Corporation, Nicholas A. Giordano, Raymond Huggenberger and others
Kent v. Intersect ENT, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08066
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Intersect ENT, Inc., Thomas A. West, Kieran T. Gallahue and others
CICCOTELLI v. INTERSECT ENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INTERSECT ENT, INC., KIERAN T GALLAHUE, THOMAS A WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Jones v. Intersect ENT, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01339
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Intersect ENT, Inc., Kieran T. Gallahue, Thomas A. West and others
Waterman v. Intersect ENT, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07552
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Intersect ENT, Inc., Kieran T. Gallahue, Thomas A. West and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
