Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Budukiewicz v. ESS Tech Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Michael Budukiewicz and Maurice A. Rendon
Defendant:
ESS Tech Inc., Eric P. Dresselhuys and Amir Moftakhar
Wakefield v. Ess Tech Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Wakefield
Defendant:
Ess Tech Inc., Eric P. Dresselhuys and Amir Moftakhar
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company v. Weyland Tech et al
as 3:2018cv00492
Plaintiff:
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company
Defendant:
Ramasamy Ravindran, Weyland Tech and Weyland Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Rensel v. Centra Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv24500
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zowie Thomas Rensel
Defendant:
Centra Tech, Inc. , Sohrab Sharma , Raymond Trapani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McManus v. Tetra Tech Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas McManus
Defendant:
Tetra Tech Construction, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Korzen v. Tetra Tech Inc et al
as 2:2013cv04724
Defendant:
Dan L Batrack, Steven M Burdick and Tetra Tech Inc
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Korzen
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Recycle Tech, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21656
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Recycle Tech, Inc., Ryan Gonzalez, OTC Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Calidad Auto Tech, Inc. v. Search Automotive Technologies, LLC
as 3:2011cv00653
Plaintiff:
Calidad Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant:
Search Automotive Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nanopierce Tech Inc. v. Southridge Capital, et al
as 1:2002cv00767
Plaintiff:
Nanopierce Tech Inc.
Defendant:
Southridge Capital Management, LLC, Dan Pickett, Patricia E. Singer and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Christina Skousen, Barry Honig, Kristi Kampmann and others
Counter Defendant:
Paul H. Metzinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
