Cases 121 - 130 of 251
Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv12369
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Denise Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walsh v. Saul
as 3:2019cv30150
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kelly D Walsh
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Woolley v. Saul et al
as 3:2019cv30148
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Linda M. Dorn
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Mason Woolley and Pro Se Party Mason Woolley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Zaragoza v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv12266
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda Zaragoza
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doughty v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv12101
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony Doughty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doughty v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv12101
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Anthony Doughty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lemieux v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11961
Plaintiff:
Jean Paul Lemieux
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scibelli v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11930
Plaintiff:
Adam N. Scibelli
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv30121
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Ruth Esther Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bartlett v. Saul
as 1:2019cv11767
Plaintiff:
Peter Alan Bartlett
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
