Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Gary Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffith v. Commissioner of SSA
as 3:2009cv00213
Plaintiff:
Billy Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Griffith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Linda Griffith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Griffiths v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 1:2009cv01637
Plaintiff:
Horace Griffiths
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity and Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv08816
Plaintiff:
Faith Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Griffith v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Carla Griffith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Griffith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv01926
Plaintiff:
Eugene Griffith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Griffith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 4:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Becky E. Griffith, .
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Griffith v. Barnhart
as 6:2008cv06004
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Marie Griffith
Defendant:
JoAnne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David A Griffith v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv07862
Plaintiff:
David A Griffith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.