Cases 71 - 80 of 251
THOMAS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
TONYA M THOMAS and TONYA M. THOMAS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schillaci v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Schillaci
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holtorf v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01399
Plaintiff:
Brooke Marie Holtorf
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Wulle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Tamara Alice Wulle
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Casper v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03050
Plaintiff:
Justin Casper
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hladky v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hladky
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STEPHENS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA S. STEPHENS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02809
Plaintiff:
Erinn Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Koepsel v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02963
Plaintiff:
Alyssa L. Koepsel
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reason v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Reason
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
