Cases 101 - 110 of 223
COLEMAN v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv01513
Plaintiff:
REGEANIA HUNTER COLEMAN
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Coleman v. Sterling Backcheck
as 4:2014cv02508
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Coleman
Defendant:
Sterling Backcheck
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Coleman v. Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
as 1:2014cv00609
Plaintiff:
Dierdre Coleman
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. RJM Acquisitions (NY) LLC
as 3:2014cv00863
Plaintiff:
Louis Coleman
Defendant:
RJM Acquisitions (NY) LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peter Gakuba v. Mark Karner, et al
as 14-2603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KARNER, Assistant U,.S. Attorney, Individually and Officially, TIMOTHY SIMON, FBI, Individually and Officially, SUSAN HANSON, FBI, 06gr1328, Individually and Officially and others
COLEMAN v. KOLB et al
as 1:2014cv01108
Plaintiff:
RODNEY COLEMAN
Defendant:
WADE S. KOLB, DEBORAH T. NIELSON, MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman III v. Bluegreen Resorts Management, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv80856
Plaintiff:
Albert Coleman III
Defendant:
Bluegreen Resorts Management, Inc. , Bluegreen Servicing LLC and Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.
as 4:2014cv01090
Plaintiff:
Russell Coleman
Defendant:
Berman & Rabin, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman v. Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
as 1:2014cv03917
Plaintiff:
Dierdre Coleman
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
as 4:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Dierdre Coleman
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc. d/b/a Macy's Credit Card Service
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
