Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Fisher v. Smith et al
as 1:2017mi00006
Plaintiff:
Annie S. Fisher
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Robert J. Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Christopher Brophy, et al v. Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 14-10213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BROPHY and TARA LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JIANGBO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JIN LINXIAN, ELSA SUNG and others
:
SERVICE
Mark Wasmuth v. Sanjiv Da
as 13-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ALLEN WASMUTH, a living Immortal Spiritual being, a living physical man and MEREDITH PHILLIPPI WASMUTH, a living Immortal Spiritual being, a living physical woman
Defendant - Appellee:
SANJIV DAS, Acting artificially as a ordinary/officer/president for CitiMortgage Inc, PAUL INCE, Acting artificially as ordinary/officer/CFO for CitiMortgage Inc, JERRY OCHELTREE, Acting artificially as ordinary/officer/president for First Bank Inc and others
THOMAS v. PYROMET, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04413
Plaintiff:
LESLIE ELLIS THOMAS
Defendant:
PYROMET, INC. and LORGUS CFO SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
John King, et al v. Hospital Corporation of Americ, et al
as 09-5377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. KING, D.O. and JOHN A. KING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, FRANK L. MOLINARO, CEO of Putnam General Hospital, TEYAS VALLEY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and others
Adams, Stephen S., et al v. Hinchman, James, et al
as 97-5121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen S. Adams, Elias K. Aivazis, Christopher J. Algieri and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James F. Hinchman, Acting Comptroller General of the United States General Accounting Office, United States General Accounting Office, Richard J. Watkins, Assistant Director (Management/CFO) Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
