Cases 11 - 20 of 286
In re Naturalization Ceremony 9/13/2023
as 3:2023mc80224
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Oleksandra Boiko Acosta, Neftaly de Jesus Aguilar Rodriguez and others
R. v. Villareal-Gomez
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
G. R.
Defendant:
Jared Villareal-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Gomez v. NCP Finance Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Katie J. Alvarez Gomez
Defendant:
NCP Finance Limited Partnership, TitleMax of Texas, Inc. and TitleMax of Texas Inc doing business as TitleMax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
United States of America v. Ledesma et al
as 2:2022mc51646
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamile Ledesma, Jason Ledesma, Uriel Galvan-Maciel and others
Interested Party:
Joshua Venable
Valadez-Cazares et al v. Montes-Villalpando et al
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Valadez-Cazares, Maurilio Osorio-Carreno and Juan Manuel Gomez-Garcia
Defendant:
Roberto Montes-Villalpando, Abraham Montes, El Cubilete LLC and others
Jimaya Gomez, et al v. Intel Corporation
as 22-35652
Not Classified By Court:
In re: INTEL CORP. CPU MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMAYA GOMEZ, RYAN CLARK, LOUISA FERRER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv02284
Plaintiff:
JEREMY A. GOMEZ and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
GOMEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv02285
Plaintiff:
JEREMY A. GOMEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
DEL AGUILA TELLO v. GOMEZ SALVATIERRA
as 2:2022cv02918
Plaintiff:
JACKIE LESLIE DEL AGUILA TELLO
Defendant:
RICARDO VICENTE GOMEZ SALVATIERRA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
