Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hooker v. Comenity LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hooker
Defendant:
Comenity LLC , Asset Acceptance, LLC , Equifax Information Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooker v. National Aeronautics and Space Adminstration (GSFC)
as 1:2013cv02552
Plaintiff:
Stanford B. Hooker, Ph.D.
Defendant:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (GSFC)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hooker v. Shogren et al
as 8:2013cv01655
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert C. Shogren , Lionel Barela and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hooker v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Francis W. Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Hooker v. Halmayli
as 3:2012cv03018
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Hooker
Defendant:
Gregory A. Halmayli and Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
HOOKER v. NASA
as 1:2012cv01358
Plaintiff:
STANFORD B. HOOKER
Defendant:
NASA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Michael Perry v. Hooker Creek Asphalt and Pavin, et al
as 12-35278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY PERRY, United States of America ex rel.
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKER CREEK ASPHALT AND PAVING, LLC, OREGON MAINLINE PAVING, LLC, J.C. COMPTON CONTRACTOR, INC. and others
Hooker v. The Sofia Hotel et al
as 3:2011cv02417
Plaintiff:
Charles Hooker
Defendant:
The Sofia Hotel, Sofia Hotel Management, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Hooker v. The United States Of America
as 1:2011cv02840
Plaintiff:
Caleb Jamel Hooker
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hooker v. ATM of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kari Hooker
Defendant:
ATM of America, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
