Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Goggans v. Capital One Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv04117
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Goggans
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA, N.A. and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Radcliffe v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 6:2017cv00911
Plaintiff:
Conrad Radcliffe
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Whitlock v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
as 2:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kyle C Whitlock
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Bailiff v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Bailiff
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and Optio Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Casey v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Michelle Casey
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00396
Plaintiff:
Michelle Howard
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 153
Gilbert v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 0:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gilbert
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252
GOGGANS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
KAREEM A. GOGGANS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Laurentano v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sandra Laurentano
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
VIGGIANO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 3:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
AMY VIGGIANO
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
