Cases 11 - 20 of 139
City of Philadelphia et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022mc00049
Plaintiff:
City of Philadelphia, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC and others
REPUBLIC GROUP, LLC et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv14634
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC GROUP, LLC, MBE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, RAFAEL MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MERRILL, LYNCH, A BANK OF AMERICA COMPANY, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marc S. Kirschner v. Richard L. Dickson et al
as 1:2020cv04436
Defendant:
Russell 2500 Index Fund, Master Small Cap Index Series of Quantitative Master Series LLC, Russell 2000 Index Non-Lendable Fund and others
Not Classified By Court:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Marc S Kirschner
Interested Party:
State Street Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABC v. DEF
as 1:2020cv04433
Defendant:
WCFS Inc., Pinnacle West Corp., MFO Management Company (Towle Fund) and others
Plaintiff:
ABC, Marc S. Kirschner and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., v. de Moraes
as 9:2020mc82159
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc.,
Defendant:
Jose Carlos de Moraes
United States of America v. Benjamin Rosenberg
as 2:2019cv10132
Defendant:
BENJAMIN ROSENBERG
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Garnishee:
Bank of America, N.A., Bank Leumi USA and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
ENFORCEMENT OF PHILIPPINE FORFEITURE JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL ASSETS OF ARELMA, S.A., FORMERLY HELD AT MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACCOUNT NUMBER 16
as 1:2019mc00412
Intervenor:
Jose Duran, Jeana Roxas as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger Roxas and Golden Budha Corporation
Interested Party:
United States of America
Respondent:
Philippine National Bank
In Re:
Enforcement Of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment Against All Assets Of Arelma, S.A., Formerly Held At Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Including, But Not Limited To, Account Number 16
Wells v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2019cv04605
Plaintiff:
Vernon C. Wells and Jean Winston
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Inv. Inc., Aurora Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation
as 1:2012mc02296
Plaintiff:
NOTE HOLDERS: Wilmington Trust Company, Marc S. Kirschner, RETIREES: William A. Niese and others
Defendant:
CURRENT & FORMER DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS: Harry Amsden: Stephen D. Carver: Dennis J. FitzSimons: Robert Gremillion: Donald C. Grenesko: David Dean Hiller: Timothy J. Landon: Thomas D. Leach: Luis E. Le, LARGE SHAREHOLDERS: McCormick and Cantigny Foundations, New Life International Trust and others
Interested Party:
General Motors Hourly-Rate Employees Pension Trust, Exhibit A Shareholder Defendants' Executive Committee and THE EFFIE AND WOFFORD CAIN FOUNDATION
Not Classified By Court:
Valuation Research Corporation
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Geraldo Rivera, Ervin L Heyde, Jr and Defendants listed on Schedule A
Consolidated Defendant:
New Life International
Intervenor Plaintiff:
TENDERING PHONES HOLDERS: Citadel Equity Fund Ltd., Camden Asset Management LP and Certain of their Affiliates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
United Natural Foods, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01607
Defendant:
Stephan J. Feldgoise, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Goldman Sachs Lending Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Natural Foods, Inc.
Intervenor:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 632
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
