Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Carol Engen v. Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 13-35552
Petitioner - Appellant:
CAROL ENGEN
Respondent - Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Engen v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2013cv01024
Petitioner:
Carol Engen
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Calvin Kim, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-5013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Ki Sun Kim and Chun Cha Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, IRS Commissioner, Dennis Parizek and others
Johannes Weber v. USA, et al
as 11-5031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johannes Weber
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Attorney General of the United States, James Singleton, U.S. District Judge, Individual Capacity and others
WEBER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00061
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, JAMES SINGLTON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHANNES WEBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treymel Coleman et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2010cv07173
Plaintiff:
Mary Callum, Treymel Coleman, K. E. and others
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer J. Gurrola and others
WILDER v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2009cv03475
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Unknown agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WILDER v. BARRY et al
as 1:2009cv03481
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr.
Defendant:
John Barry and Unknown agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WILDER v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2009cv02265
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
WILDER v. BARRY et al
as 1:2009cv02264
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN BARRY and UNKNOWN AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
