Cases 21 - 30 of 780
Faizi v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
FAZIL RAHMAN Faizi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and BRYAN HEMMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Borgen et al
as 1:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Yimei Chen
Defendant:
Michael Borgen, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Easley et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
DeMarco Easley and Mohammed Abu Wali
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kevin Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CORTES MEDINA v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv20294
Plaintiff:
Heidy Yadira CORTES MEDINA
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Mr. Garrett Ripa, Patrick J Lechleitner and others
Nesbitt v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Nesbitt, II
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
GE CHEN and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and ALISSA L. EMMEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Osmonbekov v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Melis Osmonbekov
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Kevin J. Riddle and Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Suthrave et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ramesh Suthrave and Sandhya Rani Suthrave
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Petkovski v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv16897
Plaintiff:
Igor Petkovski
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kevin J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03685
Plaintiff:
XIYU ZHANG and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALISSA EMMEL, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
