Cases 31 - 40 of 253
Caudle v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Allen Ohechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Alabama, Redact Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD. v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2022mc80184
Respondent:
CPC PATENT TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.
Petitioner:
Apple Inc.
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Apple Recovery Services Corp.
as 1:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
Vivian Rodriguez-Diaz
Defendant:
Apple Recovery Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Litigation
as 3:2022mc80140
Plaintiff:
In re National Football League's "Sunday Ticket" Litigation
Petitioner:
Apple Inc.
L.W. v. Snap Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
L.W.
Defendant:
Snap Inc., Apple Inc. and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pl Fed. Question: Product Liability
IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE E-MAIL ACCOUNT SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
as 1:2022ml00266
In Re:
IN RE APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE E-MAIL ACCOUNT SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re Ex Parte Application of Tsukasa Akimoto
as 3:2022mc80056
Plaintiff:
Tsukasa Akimoto and IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF TSUKASA AKIMOTO
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Neil Bergeson, Jr. v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 22-1318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr., a state citizen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of South Dakota, Judge Cullen Parker McNeece, Dylan Kirchmeirier and others
SOLAS OLED LTD. v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al
as 5:2022mc80005
Plaintiff:
SOLAS OLED LTD.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Respondent:
Apple Inc.
Diep v. Apple, Inc.
as 4:2021cv10063
Plaintiff:
Hadona Diep
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
