Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Gilbert Spurlock v. Dana Hurst
as 09-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT L. SPURLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANA R. HURST, Colonel and U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS et al v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, SOUTHERN ARIZONA HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION and HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ARIZONA
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA P. JACKSON, MICHAEL H. SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Spurlock v. Hurst et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Gilbert L. Spurlock
Defendant:
Dana R. Hurst and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
