Cases 41 - 50 of 230
Llamas et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Cira Llamas and Eduardo Chavez Perea
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Doe 1 through Doe 10
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 FHLB: Financial Inst Reform Receiving Enforcement Act 1989
Ferguson v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2022cv01947
Plaintiff:
Jason D. Ferguson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MACI BROWN et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2021cv06406
Plaintiff:
MACI BROWN, ANN BARELA, ROBERT LUEHMAN and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Guffy v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jean Guffy
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 50 and RP Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Partin v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Joseph Partin
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MCCOY v. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MCCOY
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
May et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Charles A May, Tessa May and Charles A. May
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Bank of America, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Charles Fleming
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Trevino v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2022cv03263
Plaintiff:
Rolando Trevino
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gomez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Ralph Gomez and Erin Gomez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Santiago v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Jose Santiago
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
