Cases 51 - 60 of 114
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Jones
as 1:2016cv07793
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Latreece A. Jones
Counter_claimant:
Latreece A. Jones
Counter_defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Third_party_defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and McCalla Raymer Pierce, LLC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Latreece A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rozwadowska v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv07184
Plaintiff:
J Rozwadowska
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and QBE First Insurance Agency, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Gorman v. Seterus, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01915
Plaintiff:
Glenn M. Gorman
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Scott v. Seterus Inc
as 4:2016cv01982
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Seterus Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Kirkland-Chea v. Seterus, Inc.
as 8:2016cv01505
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kirkland-Chea
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Fox v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv05715
Plaintiff:
Theresa B. Fox
Defendant:
Manley, Deas & Kochalski, LLC and Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fernandez v. Seterus, Inc.
as 1:2016cv21787
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Fernandez
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tripicchio et al v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04967
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Tripicchio and Denise Tripicchio
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Codilis & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pennicott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv03044
Plaintiff:
Marcia P. Pennicott
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Seterus, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Proffitt v. Seterus, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00915
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Proffitt
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
