Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NJOY LLC v. iMiracle HK Limited et al
as 2:2023cv08798
Defendant: American Vape Company LLC, iMiracle HK Limited, Shenzhen iMiracle Technology Co. Ltd and others
Plaintiff: NJOY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
State of Tennessee et al v. Bottle Buzz, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee and Jonathan Skrmetti
Defendant: Bottle Buzz, Inc. doing business as Bottle Buzz, Cask Cartel Distilleries and Distribution doing business as Cask Cartel, The Liquor Bros doing business as The Liquor Bros doing business as Lena's Liquor and others
Kernan v. New York State Department of F
as 16-3643
Plaintiff: Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company
Plaintiff - Appellant: James M. Kernan, individually and on behalf of all those independent entrepreneurs, small and disadvantaged business enterprises, suffering serious, permanent and irreparable economic and social injury and damage as a result of actions by the Defendants t
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Department of Financial Services, FKA New York State Department of Insurance, Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of New York State Department of Financial Services, Charles Buzz Sawyer, Assistant Chief Investigator and others
Defendant: Michael A. Mark, Investigator, Beth Cohen, Esq., Associate Attorney, Edward R. Broton, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Kernan v. New York State Department of F
as 16-3658
Plaintiff: James M. Kernan, individually and on behalf of all those independent entrepreneurs, small and disadvantaged business enterprises, suffering serious, permanent and irreparable economic and social injury and damage as a result of actions by the Defendants t
Plaintiff - Appellant: Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Department of Financial Services, FKA New York State Department of Insurance, Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of New York State Department of Financial Services, Charles Buzz Sawyer, Assistant Chief Investigator and others
Defendant: Michael A. Mark, Investigator, Beth Cohen, Esq., Associate Attorney, Edward R. Broton, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Kernan et al v. New York State Department of Financial Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv03196
Defendant: Eugene Benger, Edward R. Broton, Beth Cohen and others
Plaintiff: James M. Kernan, Oriska Corporation and Oriska Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beckstead v. Warner
as 2:2012mc01165
Plaintiff: John A. Beckstead
Defendant: Buzz Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Dr. Buzz Aldrin, et al v. Topps Company, Inc.
as 11-56890
Plaintiff - Appellant: BUZZ ALDRIN, Dr. and STARBUZZ LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: TOPPS COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation
Eva Hibnick, et al v. Brent Clifton
as 11-16640
: In re: GOOGLE BUZZ PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: EVA HIBNICK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, ANDRANIK SOUVALIAN, KATHERINE C. WAGNER and others
Objector - Appellant: BRENT CLIFTON and WARREN SIBLEY
Defendant - Appellee: GOOGLE INC.
Eva Hibnick, et al v. Megan Marek.
as 11-16638
: In re: GOOGLE BUZZ PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: EVA HIBNICK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, ANDRANIK SOUVALIAN, KATHERINE C. WAGNER and others
Objector - Appellant: MEGAN MAREK
Defendant - Appellee: GOOGLE INC.
Eva Hibnick, et al v. Steven Cope
as 11-16639
: In re: GOOGLE BUZZ PRIVACY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: EVA HIBNICK, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, ANDRANIK SOUVALIAN, KATHERINE C. WAGNER and others
Objector - Appellant: STEVEN COPE
Defendant - Appellee: GOOGLE INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?