Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Charles Gillenwater, II v. Scott Harris, et al
as 16-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Lee Gillenwater, II
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris, Clerk of the Supreme Court, Michelle Marshall, Clerk of the Supreme Court and United States of America
GILLENWATER v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE GILLENWATER
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS , MICHELLE MARSHALL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Omnicare, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01335
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee
Defendant:
Omnicare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 1:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE
Defendant:
LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles Lee Williams v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv04532
Defendant:
State of California
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Williams
Charles Lee Williams v. S Dagama et al
as 2:2012cv06700
Defendant:
S Dagama and S Dagama
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Williams
Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv02449
Plaintiff:
Doe II , Ivy He , Doe III and others
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers, Thomas Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEVEN-SKY et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv00950
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SEVEN-SKY , PEGGY LEE MEAD , CHARLES LEE and others
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Charles Lee v. Michael Wynne, et al
as 09-31097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL W WYNNE, In his official capacity as Secretary of Air Force and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE
Cintas Corporation v. Banks et al
as 3:2006cv05093
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Joe L. Banks , Paul Berry , Tory Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
